{"id":155803,"date":"2019-10-29T08:11:18","date_gmt":"2019-10-29T12:11:18","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/today.uconn.edu\/?p=155803"},"modified":"2019-10-31T10:19:34","modified_gmt":"2019-10-31T14:19:34","slug":"use-emergency-cpr-device-rising-despite-lack-evidence","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/today.uconn.edu\/2019\/10\/use-emergency-cpr-device-rising-despite-lack-evidence\/","title":{"rendered":"Use of Emergency CPR Device Rises Despite Lack of Evidence"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Despite significant cost and minimal evidence that mechanical resuscitation devices benefit patients in cardiac arrest more than resuscitation performed by people, the devices are being used more often than ever, says a new study.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The research, published this month in the <a href=\"https:\/\/jamanetwork.com\/journals\/jamanetworkopen\/fullarticle\/2752989?resultClick=1\">Journal of the American Medical Association<\/a>, found a fourfold increase of the cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) devices among emergency medical technicians in the U.S. over a six-year period.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> \u201cIt was particularly surprising because the mechanical CPR has not been tested for effectiveness by the FDA, even though it was approved by the FDA,\u201d says <a href=\"https:\/\/facultydirectory.uchc.edu\/profile?profileId=Rhee-T.%20Greg\">T. Greg Rhee<\/a> of UConn Health, and a study author. \u201cWe don\u2019t really know if it is effective in terms of keeping people alive and whether it is cost effective.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Rhee, along with collaborators at Yale University and University of California, San Francisco,<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> reviewed data from 2010 to 2016, for 892,022 patients nationally who were identified by emergency medical professionals as having an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">In settings outside of hospitals, CPR performed manually is still done much more often than by machine &#8212; about 69% of the time, the researchers found. However, t<\/span>he mechanical use rose steeply during that time period &#8212; from about 2% in 2010 to 8% in 2016.<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Increasingly, EMTs are using the devices, even though it\u2019s not clear whether it is more effective than CPR performed by hand, says Rhee, assistant professor of public health sciences who specializes in population-based clinical outcomes research and health care policy.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Scope of the problem<\/b><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.cdc.gov\/heartdisease\/facts.htm\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">According to<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, every year in the United States, a<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">bout 735,000 people have a heart attack.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">CPR, which is to be done when the heart stops beating, can double or triple the chances of survival after cardiac arrest, when done immediately by keeping the blood flow active, says<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u00a0the American Heart Association.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">An increase in incidents of cardiac arrests being treated outside of hospitals along with anecdotal evidence on an uptick in the use of the mechanical intervention helped spur the decision to do the study, according to Rhee.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">CPR is used on the vast majority of people who suffer cardiac arrest outside of hospital settings. <\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Mechanical CPR devices are expensive and prior clinical trials have not provided evidence of benefit for patients when compared with manual CPR, the authors say.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The increase is particularly worrisome, not only because of the uncertainty of clinical benefit associated with device use, but also because of the devices\u2019 known significant costs; mechanical CPR devices are often priced higher than $10,000 per unit.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u201cGiven the high costs of mechanical CPR devices, better evidence is needed to determine whether these devices improve clinically meaningful outcomes for patients treated for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest by emergency services professionals to justify the significant increase in their use,\u201d the researchers wrote.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Rhee says one possible reason for the increased use of machine CPR is marketing done by medical device companies. But more research needs to be done on that question, he says.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">More importantly, according to Rhee, more research must be done to determine the effectiveness of machine versus manual CPR, which the researchers are now planning to pursue.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u201cThis is more like an initial step to build further research on mechanical CPR used outside of the hospital setting,\u201d says Rhee.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">In addition to Rhee, authors include Peter Kahn and Joseph Ross of the Yale University School of Medicine, and Sanket Dhruva of the University of California, San Francisco.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Although the use is increasing, mechanical CPR has not been tested for effectiveness by the Federal Drug Administration (FDA), says Greg Rhee of UConn Health.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":76,"featured_media":155822,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_crdt_document":"","wds_primary_category":0,"wds_primary_series":0,"wds_primary_attribution":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2231,2076,179],"tags":[],"magazine-issues":[],"coauthors":[175],"class_list":["post-155803","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-health-well-being","category-research","category-uconn-health"],"pp_statuses_selecting_workflow":false,"pp_workflow_action":"current","pp_status_selection":"publish","acf":[],"publishpress_future_action":{"enabled":false,"date":"2026-04-18 04:35:39","action":"change-status","newStatus":"draft","terms":[],"taxonomy":"category","extraData":[]},"publishpress_future_workflow_manual_trigger":{"enabledWorkflows":[]},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/today.uconn.edu\/wp-rest\/wp\/v2\/posts\/155803","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/today.uconn.edu\/wp-rest\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/today.uconn.edu\/wp-rest\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/today.uconn.edu\/wp-rest\/wp\/v2\/users\/76"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/today.uconn.edu\/wp-rest\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=155803"}],"version-history":[{"count":13,"href":"https:\/\/today.uconn.edu\/wp-rest\/wp\/v2\/posts\/155803\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":156083,"href":"https:\/\/today.uconn.edu\/wp-rest\/wp\/v2\/posts\/155803\/revisions\/156083"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/today.uconn.edu\/wp-rest\/wp\/v2\/media\/155822"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/today.uconn.edu\/wp-rest\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=155803"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/today.uconn.edu\/wp-rest\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=155803"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/today.uconn.edu\/wp-rest\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=155803"},{"taxonomy":"magazine-issue","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/today.uconn.edu\/wp-rest\/wp\/v2\/magazine-issues?post=155803"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/today.uconn.edu\/wp-rest\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=155803"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}