{"id":68498,"date":"2012-11-07T15:14:28","date_gmt":"2012-11-07T20:14:28","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/today.uconn.edu\/?p=68498"},"modified":"2012-11-14T16:16:45","modified_gmt":"2012-11-14T21:16:45","slug":"uconn-experts-tackle-implications-of-election","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/today.uconn.edu\/2012\/11\/uconn-experts-tackle-implications-of-election\/","title":{"rendered":"UConn Experts Tackle Implications of Election"},"content":{"rendered":"<figure id=\"attachment_68509\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-68509\" style=\"width: 610px\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\"><a href=\"https:\/\/today.uconn.edu\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/11\/Election121107b211.jpg\"><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-68509  img-responsive lazyload\" title=\"Election - panel 1\" data-src=\"https:\/\/today.uconn.edu\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/11\/Election121107b211.jpg\" alt=\"A panel of UConn experts convened at Konover Auditorium on Nov. 7 to discuss the election results. From left, political science professors Vincent Moscardelli, Shayla Nunnally, Stephen Dyson, Ronald Schurin, and Charles Venator Santiago. (Peter Morenus\/UConn Photo)\" width=\"610\" height=\"407\" data-srcset=\"https:\/\/today.uconn.edu\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/11\/Election121107b211.jpg 630w, https:\/\/today.uconn.edu\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/11\/Election121107b211-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/today.uconn.edu\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/11\/Election121107b211-150x100.jpg 150w\" data-sizes=\"(max-width: 610px) 100vw, 610px\" src=\"data:image\/svg+xml;base64,PHN2ZyB3aWR0aD0iMSIgaGVpZ2h0PSIxIiB4bWxucz0iaHR0cDovL3d3dy53My5vcmcvMjAwMC9zdmciPjwvc3ZnPg==\" style=\"--smush-placeholder-width: 610px; --smush-placeholder-aspect-ratio: 610\/407;\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-68509\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">A panel of UConn experts convened at Konover Auditorium on Nov. 7 to discuss the election results. From left, political scientists Vincent Moscardelli, Shayla Nunnally, Stephen Dyson, Ronald Schurin, and Charles Venator Santiago. (Peter Morenus\/UConn Photo)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>Hours after Barack Obama won a second term as president of the United States, a panel of UConn experts convened to analyze what the results of the vote will mean for the country.<\/p>\n<p>In a panel moderated by Professor Jeremy Pressman, professors Charles Venator, Ronald Schurin, Shayla Nunnally, Vincent Moscardelli, and Stephen Dyson tackled everything from the changing demographics of the American electorate to the critical role that individual personalities play in major elections.<\/p>\n<p>The scholars also discussed the results of Connecticut\u2019s closely-watched race for an open U.S. Senate seat, in which Rep. Chris Murphy defeated former professional wrestling executive Linda McMahon, helping the Democrats maintain control of the chamber.<\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_68503\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-68503\" style=\"width: 300px\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\"><a href=\"https:\/\/today.uconn.edu\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/11\/Election121107b032.jpg\"><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-68503 img-responsive lazyload\" title=\"Election - Jeremy Pressman\" data-src=\"https:\/\/today.uconn.edu\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/11\/Election121107b032.jpg\" alt=\"Jeremy Pressman, associate professor of Political Science moderates a panel discussion on election results at Konover Auditorium on Nov. 7, 2012. (Peter Morenus\/UConn Photo)\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" data-srcset=\"https:\/\/today.uconn.edu\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/11\/Election121107b032.jpg 630w, https:\/\/today.uconn.edu\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/11\/Election121107b032-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/today.uconn.edu\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/11\/Election121107b032-150x100.jpg 150w\" data-sizes=\"(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" src=\"data:image\/svg+xml;base64,PHN2ZyB3aWR0aD0iMSIgaGVpZ2h0PSIxIiB4bWxucz0iaHR0cDovL3d3dy53My5vcmcvMjAwMC9zdmciPjwvc3ZnPg==\" style=\"--smush-placeholder-width: 300px; --smush-placeholder-aspect-ratio: 300\/200;\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-68503\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">The panel was moderated by Jeremy Pressman, associate professor of political science. (Peter Morenus\/UConn Photo)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>Overall, though, the professors agreed that while the election, like all elections, will have far-reaching effects, it mostly upheld the political status quo, with Obama in the White House, and a Congress divided between a Republican-controlled House of Representatives and a narrowly-held Democratic Senate.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cEven though we spend a lot of time talking about change, this election reveals the system\u2019s natural tendency toward stability,\u201d said Moscardelli, noting that roughly nine of 10 seats in the House didn\u2019t change hands.<\/p>\n<p>Schurin said part of the reason for this is the relatively static presidential voting habits of American states. The vast majority of states \u2013 and, therefore, their electoral votes \u2013 are essentially decided for either Democrats or Republicans long before Election Day, leaving a handful of swing states as the only real contested ground for campaigns.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWhile we are undergoing vast demographic change in this country, we\u2019re in a situation of relative geographic stability and have been for a generation,\u201d Schurin said.<\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_68506\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-68506\" style=\"width: 300px\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\"><a href=\"https:\/\/today.uconn.edu\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/11\/Election121107b097.jpg\"><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-68506 img-responsive lazyload\" title=\"Election - panel 4\" data-src=\"https:\/\/today.uconn.edu\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/11\/Election121107b097.jpg\" alt=\"Charles Venator Santiago, assistant professor of Political Science, right, speaks during a panel discussion on election results at Konover Auditorium on Nov. 7, 2012. At left are Stephen Dyson and Ronald Schurin. (Peter Morenus\/UConn Photo)\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" data-srcset=\"https:\/\/today.uconn.edu\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/11\/Election121107b097.jpg 630w, https:\/\/today.uconn.edu\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/11\/Election121107b097-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/today.uconn.edu\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/11\/Election121107b097-150x100.jpg 150w\" data-sizes=\"(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" src=\"data:image\/svg+xml;base64,PHN2ZyB3aWR0aD0iMSIgaGVpZ2h0PSIxIiB4bWxucz0iaHR0cDovL3d3dy53My5vcmcvMjAwMC9zdmciPjwvc3ZnPg==\" style=\"--smush-placeholder-width: 300px; --smush-placeholder-aspect-ratio: 300\/200;\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-68506\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Charles Venator Santiago, assistant professor of political science, right, speaks during the panel discussion. At left are Stephen Dyson and Ronald Schurin. (Peter Morenus\/UConn Photo)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>That demographic change was most evident in the coalition that elected Obama, Venator said. Obama won thanks to votes from Latinos, blacks, women, and young people, with the election showing in particular the growing clout of Latino voters.<\/p>\n<p>Former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney only won about 27 percent of the Latino vote, Venator said, about 6 percent to 8 percent worse than had been expected, and 4 percent below Sen. John McCain\u2019s showing four years ago.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWe\u2019re seeing more of a move to the Democratic Party,\u201d Venator said, noting that Latinos make up significant portions of the population in swing states like Colorado, Nevada, and Florida, all of which were won by Obama.<\/p>\n<p>That\u2019s going to have to become a focus for the Republican Party if it wants to remain competitive in future presidential elections, Nunnally said, or risk seeing its base comprised of an ever-shrinking part of the population.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe Republican Party really needs to make efforts to become attractive to these groups who primarily identify as Democrats right now,\u201d she said.<\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_68508\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-68508\" style=\"width: 300px\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\"><a href=\"https:\/\/today.uconn.edu\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/11\/Election121107b195.jpg\"><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-68508 img-responsive lazyload\" title=\"Election - panel 2\" data-src=\"https:\/\/today.uconn.edu\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/11\/Election121107b195.jpg\" alt=\"Shayla Nunnally, associate professor of Political Science, right, speaks during a panel discussion on election results at Konover Auditorium on Nov. 7, 2012. At left is Vincent Moscardelli. (Peter Morenus\/UConn Photo)\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" data-srcset=\"https:\/\/today.uconn.edu\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/11\/Election121107b195.jpg 630w, https:\/\/today.uconn.edu\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/11\/Election121107b195-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/today.uconn.edu\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/11\/Election121107b195-150x100.jpg 150w\" data-sizes=\"(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" src=\"data:image\/svg+xml;base64,PHN2ZyB3aWR0aD0iMSIgaGVpZ2h0PSIxIiB4bWxucz0iaHR0cDovL3d3dy53My5vcmcvMjAwMC9zdmciPjwvc3ZnPg==\" style=\"--smush-placeholder-width: 300px; --smush-placeholder-aspect-ratio: 300\/200;\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-68508\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Shayla Nunnally, associate professor of political science, right, speaks during the panel discussion. At left is Vincent Moscardelli. (Peter Morenus\/UConn Photo)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>But while demographics and geography and other larger factors played a significant role in the election, Dyson argued that individual personalities are still crucially important for understanding campaigns, especially in races as close as this one.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWith a closely divided country, seemingly little things \u2013 even a single decision by a single individual \u2013 can have macro-political implications,\u201d Dyson said, giving as an example Obama\u2019s decision early in his term to bail out the struggling auto industry.<\/p>\n<p>Although unpopular at the time, exit polls last night showed that 60 percent of voters in Ohio \u2013 an auto industry center \u2013 approved of the decision, and that 75 percent of those voters supported Obama.<\/p>\n<p>Personality and demographics both played a decisive role in the Connecticut Senate race, the scholars said, in which McMahon, despite spending $44 million of her own money on the campaign just two years after spending $50 million in another unsuccessful Senate bid, was handily defeated by Murphy.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cLinda McMahon had an obvious problem going into both races, and that was how she made her money,\u201d Schurin said, referring to criticism of World Wrestling Entertainment over violent or sexually suggestive programming.<\/p>\n<p>Moscardelli said a major factor in the race was the significant gender gap, with Murphy winning women\u2019s votes by a double-digit margin.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cShe needed women,\u201d he said of McMahon, adding that her efforts to appeal to those voters never quite succeeded. \u201cEven as she was picking up ground among women in terms of electability, it never translated into votes.\u201d<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Hours after Barack Obama won a second term as U.S. president, a panel of UConn experts convened to analyze what the results of the vote will mean for the country.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":68,"featured_media":68508,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_crdt_document":"","wds_primary_category":0,"wds_primary_series":0,"wds_primary_attribution":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"magazine-issues":[],"coauthors":[131],"class_list":["post-68498","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"pp_statuses_selecting_workflow":false,"pp_workflow_action":"current","pp_status_selection":"publish","acf":[],"publishpress_future_action":{"enabled":false,"date":"2026-05-12 05:28:15","action":"change-status","newStatus":"draft","terms":[],"taxonomy":"category","extraData":[]},"publishpress_future_workflow_manual_trigger":{"enabledWorkflows":[]},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/today.uconn.edu\/wp-rest\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68498","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/today.uconn.edu\/wp-rest\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/today.uconn.edu\/wp-rest\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/today.uconn.edu\/wp-rest\/wp\/v2\/users\/68"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/today.uconn.edu\/wp-rest\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=68498"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/today.uconn.edu\/wp-rest\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68498\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":68848,"href":"https:\/\/today.uconn.edu\/wp-rest\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68498\/revisions\/68848"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/today.uconn.edu\/wp-rest\/wp\/v2\/media\/68508"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/today.uconn.edu\/wp-rest\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=68498"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/today.uconn.edu\/wp-rest\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=68498"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/today.uconn.edu\/wp-rest\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=68498"},{"taxonomy":"magazine-issue","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/today.uconn.edu\/wp-rest\/wp\/v2\/magazine-issues?post=68498"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/today.uconn.edu\/wp-rest\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=68498"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}